12 Jul 2019
AL-DERZI v AL-DERZI [2019] NZHC 1626
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 1626
- Court
- High Court
Substituted service as ordered was effective, no statement of defence was filed within the prescribed period, and the plaintiff's verified affidavit and supporting evidence established entitlement to the specified liquidated sum under s 185(1)(f), entitling the plaintiff to default judgment for that sum and accrued interest against the holder of the surplus proceeds.