29 Jun 2010
MURRAY V MURRAY HC HAM CIV-2010-419-202
- Citation
- openlaw-7a970a70_e0ee_4e4b_ab6d_c691ec124eaa.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Debarring order made by the Family Court pursuant to an unopposed unless direction was valid and unappealed and cannot be collaterally attacked on this appeal; the High Court was entitled to rely on the s38 report despite its stated limitations and to make interim orders including declaration that the 999 Seapro shares were respondent's separate property and an interim payment order; failure to give further formal notice to trustees did not invalidate the orders on the evidence before the Court.