21 Sept 2023
KAMERA JACOB TAMATI HARRIS v R [2023] NZCA 462
- Citation
- [2023] NZCA 462
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Judge's sentencing exercise was within permissible range: the starting point, the 15% youth/rehabilitation discount and a 20% guilty plea discount were justified on the facts and authorities; permanent name suppression was unavailable because the appellant did not establish that publication would cause extreme hardship beyond the effects of conviction and sentence and victims' interests weighed against suppression.