8 Jun 2016
DAHIYA v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2016] NZHC 1217
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1217
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicants failed to identify a question of law of general or public importance or an exceptional injustice; the Tribunal applied the correct special circumstances test (Rajan), there is no statutory duty to separately notify visa holders of visa type, and the applicants did not demonstrate how they would have acted differently if notified, so the criteria for s 245 leave are not met.