20 Nov 2017
A (CA307/2017) v R [2017] NZCA 531
- Citation
- [2017] NZCA 531
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Extension of time was granted; on review the jury verdicts were not unreasonable because the quality and context of evidence differed between incidents allowing rational verdicts; inconsistencies alleged were reconciled by differences in specificity and context; sentencing was within the available discretion and not manifestly excessive despite technical double counting of indecent assaults; modest credit for good character was appropriate; publication order under s200 was made to protect complainants.