6 Nov 2018
CHERYL SITARA SINGH v BODY CORPORATE 207650 [2018] NZHC 2872
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2872
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because none of the grounds raised a question of law or fact capable of bona fide and serious argument of sufficient public or private importance to justify further appeal: Levies 2 and 3 had been held lawful and alleged contractor or managerial errors do not excuse payment and are matters for separate proceedings; the quorum challenge failed because a valid quorum existed at either the 29 April or 24 May 2017 meeting; apportionment complaints were too vague to be seriously arguable; and indemnity costs are recoverable under s124(2).