17 Dec 2012
NABOU V MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION HC AK CIV-2012-404-4215
- Citation
- openlaw-f9c91f0f_5a21_4b1a_8d87_91f1c0e0af84.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the Tribunal properly considered the mandatory s105(2) factors on the evidence, the applicant's complaints were essentially factual or involved non‑material errors (the jury/bench misstatement and minor sentencing note inconsistency), the identified factual errors did not amount in combination to an error of law nor raise questions of general or public importance, and therefore no lawful basis for granting leave under s245(3) was established.