3 Oct 2012
ERWOOD v MAXTED & ORS SC 28/2012
- Citation
- ERWOOD v MAXTED & ORS SC 28/2012
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the contested issues did not meet the statutory threshold of general or public importance or demonstrate a substantial miscarriage of justice: concurrent factual and evaluative findings that the applicant was not incapacitated and had concealed assets made the capacity and solvency arguments unsuitable for a second appeal, and the legal proposition that solvency alone mandates setting aside a bankruptcy notice was rejected.