20 Jul 1999
Curline v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1999] NZACC 200
- Court
- District Court
Because s51 establishes a distinct 'capacity for work' test applied via the s50 gazetted procedure, and the occupational and medical assessments (notably Mr Talbot) objectively supported that the appellant could build to 30+ hours per week within the permitted ramp‑up period, the Review Officer correctly found the appellant had a capacity for work and the cessation of weekly compensation from 30 April 1999 was lawful.