2 Apr 2014
FANSHAWE 136 LIMITED & 136 FANSHAWE LIMITED v FANSHAWE CAPITAL LIMITED & WILSON PARKING NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2014] NZHC 650
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 650
- Court
- High Court
The Court found that (1) costs for the summary judgment application should lie where they fall because the application was appropriately discontinued and the matter required full trial; (2) only one set of trial bundles was prepared so plaintiffs may recover only one bundle-preparation item reduced to reflect defendant's contribution, fixed at $4,004.90; and (3) neither party was solely at fault for the aborted trial due to judicial recusal, so costs for that aborted hearing lie where they fall; cumulatively Wilson must pay plaintiffs $51,732.90.