NIYIGENA v. ECOBANK RWANDA PLC N’UNDI

NIYIGENA v. ECOBANK RWANDA PLC N’UNDI

Ecobank had no legal right to sell Kantarama Félicie's collateral for loans not expressly covered by the original mortgage agreement, as the subsequent debts were neither specified in the contract nor registered as required by law. The original secured debt was repaid, thus the collateral should have been released....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.2-2025
Parties
Applicant: Niyigena Eraste; Respondent: Ecobank Rwanda Plc; Interested Party: Kantarama Félicie
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 June 2024
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00005/2023/SC
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial / Supreme Court Review (retrial on Grounds of Injustice)
Outcome
Judgment for applicant; prior decisions reversed in full.
Legal Topics
Guarantee Agreements, Mortgage Law, Enforcement of Security, Bank Liability, Compensation for Wrongful Sale of Collateral
Source Language
rw
Civil Law Commercial Law Secured Transactions Guarantee Agreements Mortgage Law Enforcement of Security Bank Liability Compensation for Wrongful Sale of Collateral

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Niyigena Eraste

Applicant

Ecobank Rwanda Plc

Respondent

Kantarama Félicie

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Commercial / Supreme Court Review (retrial on Grounds of Injustice)

  1. 1 Whether Ecobank had the right to sell Kantarama Félicie's collateral for loans not expressly covered by the original mortgage agreement.
  2. 2 Whether Kantarama Félicie was liable for subsequent loans taken by Niyigena Eraste using her collateral without her explicit consent or registration.
  3. 3 Entitlement to compensation for wrongful sale of collateral after the original secured debt was repaid.

Ratio Decidendi

Ecobank had no legal right to sell Kantarama Félicie's collateral for loans not expressly covered by the original mortgage agreement, as the subsequent debts were neither specified in the contract nor registered as required by law. The original secured debt was repaid, thus the collateral should have been released. Ecobank is liable to compensate Kantarama Félicie for the wrongful sale.

Court Disposition

Judgment for applicant; prior decisions reversed in full.

Orders

  • Ecobank Rwanda Plc to pay Kantarama Félicie 261,173,067 Frw for the value of the collateral.
  • Ecobank Rwanda Plc to pay Kantarama Félicie 1,400,000 Frw for legal fees across all instances.