Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Commercial law RCOMA 00004/2024/CA

GUARDSMARK Ltd vs RWIRANGA N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal held that an appeal from a High Commercial Court decision on annulment of an arbitral award is not admissible and dismissed GUARDSMARK Ltd’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

  • Arbitration award challenge
  • Jurisdiction of courts
  • Appealability of arbitral award decisions
  • Costs and attorney fees
  • Arbitration-award-challenge
  • Appellate-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00500/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NYIRANZAYINO BYUKUSENGE

The Court of Appeal found that the lower court did not give sufficient weight to the mitigating factors of first-time offending and the defendant's youthful age. Applying consistent sentencing as in similar cases, the sentence was reduced from 20 to 16 years imprisonment.

  • Defilement of a minor
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00370/2024/CA –

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NIYONIZEYE

The Court of Appeal dismissed Niyonizeye David’s appeal and upheld his 15-year sentence for defilement of a five-year-old child.

  • Defilement of a minor
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RADAA00017/2024/CA

KAYINAMURA vs IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO (RRA)

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear the second appeal because the total damages awarded by the lower courts (2,712,703 Frw) do not meet the statutory threshold of 75,000,000 Frw required by Article 52(2)(8) of Law No 30/2018. The applicant's argument that the initial claim value should control is rejected; only the amount awarded is relevant. The respondent is entitled to partial costs and attorney fees given the outcome and the statutory framework.

  • Jurisdiction of appellate courts
  • Quantum of damages
  • Retirement benefits
  • Staff retention schemes
  • Costs and attorney fees
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RADAA 00013/2024/CA

MUNGU AKONKWA vs IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO (RRA)

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction over second appeals where the damages awarded by the lower courts do not reach the statutory threshold of 75,000,000 Frw, regardless of the amount claimed by the applicant. Only the sum awarded by the lower courts is relevant for jurisdictional purposes.

  • Jurisdiction of appellate courts
  • Quantification of claims
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Costs and attorney fees
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00394/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. BAKUNDUKIZE

The Court of Appeal held that a first admission of guilt on second appeal cannot ground mitigation, but reduced the sentence from 25 to 13 years for proportionality.

  • Defilement
  • Mitigation of sentence
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Sentencing-mitigation
  • Appeal-procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 00044/2022/CA

ATX TECHNOLOGY Ltd v ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Ltd

The Court of Appeal dismissed ATX TECHNOLOGY Ltd’s appeal, holding that it had not proved an undisputed debt owed by EDCL to OIA from which payment could be claimed.

  • Assignment of rights
  • Subcontractor payment
  • Damages
  • Evidence in commercial cases
  • Assignment-of-rights
  • Subcontractor-payment
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00547/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NGOBOKA

The Court of Appeal held that prior precedents based on repealed provisions cannot be followed and upheld Ngoboka Jean Claude’s 15-year prison term and fine.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00390/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWURUKUNDO

The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction for drug selling but reduced the sentence from 25 years and a 20,000,000 Frw fine to 17 years and 5,000,000 Frw.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00498/2022/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BARANYERETSE

The Court of Appeal held that first-time admission of guilt on appeal is not a mitigating circumstance and upheld Baranyeretse Théoneste’s 25-year sentence and fine.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.