Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RLR V.1 - 2014

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWAMURENGEYE

Evidence established intent to kill through repeated blows and motive, qualifying the act as parricide. Previous judgments were invalid due to lack of jurisdiction. The trial must commence anew in the competent court.

  • Parricide
  • Change of charge
  • Jurisdiction
  • Intent
  • Mental health in criminal liability
Read case analysis
Criminal law RLR V.1 - 2014

PPROSECUTION v. UWAMURENGEYE

The act of beating the deceased on the head with a plank, resulting in her death, demonstrates intent to kill, qualifying the offence as parricide. The judge has the right and duty to reclassify the offence, and the previous judgments are nullified for lack of jurisdiction. The competent court to try the case at first instance is the Intermediate Court of Rusizi.

  • Parricide
  • Battery and bodily injuries
  • Reclassification of offence
  • Jurisdiction of courts
Read case analysis
Criminal law

RLR-V.1- 2014

The medical report and witness statements established that the deceased died as a result of being beaten with a plank on the head by her son, Uwamurengeye Venant. The nature and location of the injuries demonstrated intent to kill, qualifying the offence as parricide. The reclassification of the offence is both a right and a duty of the judge. The previous judgments were rendered by courts lacking jurisdiction for parricide, and must be nullified. The case must be retried at first instance in the Intermediate Court of Rusizi.

  • Parricide
  • Reclassification of offence
  • Jurisdiction of courts
  • Intent to kill
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 0182/09/CS

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NTAKIYIMANA

The Supreme Court held that despite Ntakiyimana's eventual admission of guilt, the gravity and premeditation of the crime, as well as his initial denial, justified denying further sentence reduction.

  • Parricide
  • Plea of guilty
  • Sentence reduction
  • Judicial discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 0182/09/CS

THE PROSECUTION v. NTAKIYIMANA

The Supreme Court dismissed a parricide appeal, holding that a guilty plea does not automatically require penalty reduction because the court retains discretion.

  • Parricide
  • Guilty plea
  • Penalty reduction
  • Judicial discretion
  • Criminal-law
  • Guilty-plea
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 0182/09/CS

THE PROSECUTOR v. NTAKIYIMANA

The court held that despite the guilty plea, the circumstances and wickedness of the offence, including premeditation and brutality, render Ntakiyimana unworthy of penalty reduction. Judicial discretion permits denial of reduction even after a guilty plea.

  • Parricide
  • Guilty plea
  • Penalty reduction
  • Judicial discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal law RP 0058/13/HC/NYA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MPOZAYO

The High Court convicted Mpozayo Aloys alias Rukara of murdering his father, but reduced the sentence because he confessed, apologised, and had no prior convictions.

  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Confession
  • Parricide
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-law
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.