UBUSHINJACYAHA vs HAKIZIMANA
The appellate court found that the evidence relied upon by the lower courts—including the victim's testimony, corroborating witness statements, and the medical report—was consistent and credible. The appellant's alibi was not sufficiently substantiated, and discrepancies in timing or minor inconsistencies in witness accounts did not undermine the prosecution's case. The court held that the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt and upheld the conviction and sentence.
Source excerpt
- Defilement of a minor
- Alibi defence
- Evidentiary standards
- Assessment of witness credibility
- Medical evidence in sexual offences