Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial law RS/INJUST/RC 00008/2021/SC

SOCOBICO INDUSTRIES S.A vs. ECOBANK N’ABANDI

SOCOBICO Industries S.A failed to provide sufficient evidence to identify and prove the existence of its fonds de commerce in the hands of ROBA Industries Ltd or through the chain of transfers from Trust Industries Ltd and Catch Up Investment Ltd. Therefore, no restitution can be ordered against ROBA Industries Ltd. However, to clarify the composition and value of the fonds de commerce that Trust Industries Ltd was previously ordered to return, an expert accountant must be appointed to determine the assets as of the auction date.

  • Fonds de commerce
  • Security interests
  • Right of follow-up (droit de suite)
  • Enforcement of judgments
  • Auction procedures
  • Bank loans and guarantees
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 00087/2022/CA

BANK OF KIGALI PLC v. GATE HILLS ESTATE LTD N’ UNDI

The Court of Appeal held that Bank of Kigali Plc’s appeal was inadmissible because it lost on the same grounds in both lower courts, and the lower orders stood.

  • Loan agreements
  • Breach of contract
  • Security interests
  • Appeals procedure
  • Damages
  • Mortgage law
Read case analysis
Commercial law RS/INJUST/RCOM 00006/2021/CA

COOPÉRATIVE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DES ANCIENS CHAUFFEURS DE L’ETAT (CODACE) v NTAGANDA ABDALAHAMANI

The Court of Appeal held that assignment of the debt did not transfer ownership of the vehicle, and affirmed the retrial decision ordering CODACE to return it.

  • Assignment of debt
  • Security interests
  • Lease-purchase agreements
  • Remedies for breach of contract
  • Retrial for miscarriage of justice
  • Assignment-of-debt
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMA 00008/2021/CA

MUSABYIMANA Spéciose v BANK OF KIGALI Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that collateral and repayment are separate obligations, so MUSABYIMANA Spéciose remained liable for the unpaid loan balance after auction of the security.

  • Loan agreements
  • Security interests
  • Auction of collateral
  • Procedural fairness
  • Damages
  • Interest on debt
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMA 00008/2021/CA

MUSABYIMANA Spéciose v. BANK OF KIGALI Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that collateral and debt are distinct obligations, so the borrowers remained liable for the unpaid balance after auction of the secured house.

  • Loan agreements
  • Security interests
  • Foreclosure
  • Procedural fairness
  • Damages
  • Interest on debt
Read case analysis
Civil law RS/INJUST/RC 00002/2019/CA

NTABARESHYA v MUHORAKEYE N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal held that a seller cannot use as security a vehicle already sold to another person without the buyer’s consent, and ordered return of the vehicle.

  • Contract law
  • Sale of goods
  • Security interests
  • Enforcement of judgments
  • Contract-law
  • Sale-of-goods
Read case analysis
Commercial law RLR V.3-2018

KCB BANK UGANDA LTD v. KIIZA & LOUISE (KL) LTD_kn

The Supreme Court held that Rwandan courts had jurisdiction over a Ugandan bank’s claim because the defendants lived in Rwanda and the collateral was in Rwanda.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Foreign contracts
  • Security interests
  • Enforcement of foreign judgments
  • Foreign-contracts
  • Security-interests
Read case analysis
Contract law RLR V.1-2019

I&M BANK v. SEBULIKOKO _en

The Supreme Court held that failure to re-register a security interest did not invalidate it between the parties while the debt remained unpaid, and upheld the bank’s auction.

  • Security interests
  • Registration of security interests
  • Mortgage validity
  • Loan default
  • Auction of secured property
  • Secured-transactions
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCOMAA 007/13/CS

COGEBANQUE Ltd v. MUVUNYI

The Supreme Court held it had jurisdiction to hear a commercial appeal after finding the mortgaged property’s value in the record exceeded the statutory threshold.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Appeals
  • Security interests
  • Immovable property
  • Loan agreements
  • Commercial-appeals
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.