Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that the trial court failed to comply with section 226(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act before proceeding in the appellant’s absence.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a rape conviction and set aside a 30-year sentence after finding a material variance in the date alleged.
The applicants established good cause for extension of time due to uncertainty regarding when they were made aware of the conviction and sentence imposed in absentia, and the absence of prejudice to the respondent.
Source excerpt
The conviction for statutory rape was quashed due to failure to prove the age of the victim beyond reasonable doubt, as required by law. The conviction for impregnating a school girl was upheld because sufficient oral and documentary evidence established the victim was a school girl and was impregnated by the appellant.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to establish a proper chain of custody for the seized drugs and the charge sheet was fatally defective, resulting in failure to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. These defects go to the root of the case and entitle the appellant to acquittal.
Source excerpt
The conviction and sentence are quashed because the charge was duplex, containing two distinct offences in one count, and the trial magistrate failed to comply with section 226(2) of the CPA by not giving the appellant an opportunity to explain his absence after re-arrest, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
Source excerpt
Failure of the successor magistrate to record reasons for taking over the trial from his predecessor, as required by section 214(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, renders the proceedings from that point a nullity and the judgment unlawful, regardless of the accused's absence during trial.
Source excerpt
The High Court erred by failing to consider that the appellant became aware of the judgment only upon being committed to prison and that, as a prisoner, he had no control over the filing process. The appellant filed the notice of appeal within ten days of becoming aware of the judgment and showed good cause for delay in filing the appeal. The High Court's refusal to grant extension was therefore unjustified.
Source excerpt
The High Court quashed a conviction and sentence entered in absentia, finding a defective alternative charge, an illegal sentence, and procedural errors affecting the surety.
The appellant was never properly tried as there was no evidence of his appearance in court for plea, no remand or commitment warrant, and the plea was equivocal due to procedural irregularities. Therefore, the conviction and sentence are invalid.
Source excerpt
Explore more
