Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The applicant failed to provide proof of exhaustion of available and effective domestic remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the Charter; therefore, the application is inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The application is inadmissible because the applicant did not exhaust local remedies, as the cassation appeal was still pending and not unduly prolonged.
Source excerpt
The African Commission found Madagascar violated the complainant’s rights when her presidential candidacy was annulled without a proper hearing and without justification for the residency restriction.
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights ordered joinder of three related applications from Côte d’Ivoire because they arose from the same trial and raised similar claims.
The facts supporting the applications, the alleged violations, and the measures sought are similar, and the respondent State is identical. Joinder is appropriate for the proper administration of justice under Article 54 of the Rules of Court.
Source excerpt
The applications are based on similar facts, arise from the same criminal proceedings and conviction, allege similar violations, seek similar remedies, and involve the same respondent; therefore, joinder is appropriate for the proper administration of justice.
Source excerpt
The Respondent State violated Article 7(1)(c) of the Charter by failing to provide the applicants with prosecution witness statements and denying them the opportunity to cross-examine material witnesses, and by failing to facilitate an impotence test for the First Applicant. These violations entail a breach of Article 1 of the Charter. Other alleged violations were not substantiated or proven.
Source excerpt
Explore more
