ELINEEMA KITILA MGUTYA VS PETRO MAKALA JUDGMENT
The respondent proved ownership of the disputed land by adducing consistent, cogent, and corroborated evidence tracing title from his late mother, while the appellant failed to prove acquisition by gift inter vivos due to lack of supporting witnesses or documentation. The trial tribunal properly exercised its discretion in declining to visit the locus in quo, as there was no dispute over boundaries or physical features. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
- Burden of proof
- Ownership of land
- Gift inter vivos
- Locus in quo
- Appellate review