Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Applicant demonstrated good cause for delay due to reliance on counsel and prison circumstances; court exercised discretion to grant extension.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted James Komba an extension of time to file a notice of intention to appeal and petition of appeal after conviction for rape.
Noncompliance with Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in failing to enter separate convictions and sentences for each count is a fatal irregularity; the sentence is set aside and the record remitted to the trial court to enter proper convictions and sentences.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the offence of store breaking against the appellant, but the conviction for failure to prevent the commission of the offence was proper as the appellant was responsible for the security of the premises.
Source excerpt
The High Court found the trial judgment defective because it did not properly record a conviction before sentence, and remitted the file for a proper judgment.
The High Court found the trial judgment fatally defective for failing to properly record conviction and sentence, and remitted the file for a lawful judgment.
The failure of the trial court to enter a conviction before sentencing was a fatal and incurable irregularity, rendering the judgment and sentence a nullity. Consequently, the first appellate court erred in dismissing the appeal and remitting the file for conviction instead of striking out the appeal. The proper procedure is to nullify the proceedings and judgments of both lower courts and remit the file to the trial court for a proper judgment in compliance with the law.
Source excerpt
The trial court's failure to convict the appellants before sentencing rendered its judgment a nullity; the appellate judge's procedure in dismissing the appeal and remitting the file was improper. The proper course was to strike out the appeal and remit the record for a proper judgment in compliance with the law.
Source excerpt
The respondent's appeal at the High Court was time barred as the petition of appeal was filed outside the prescribed forty-five days and the notice of appeal was defective; therefore, the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Source excerpt
The trial court's failure to properly convict and sentence the appellant as required by law rendered its judgment fatally defective and incompetent; therefore, the High Court cannot uphold or dismiss the appeal and must remit the file to the trial court for proper conviction and sentencing in accordance with the law.
Source excerpt
Explore more
