Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition law [2026] CAT 45

Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd & Ors

Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd & Ors [2026] CAT 45 (12 May 2026)

The Competition Appeal Tribunal dismissed David Courtney Boyle’s claim against Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and others, finding no abuse of dominance and no basis for collective proceedings.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Collective proceedings
  • Rail transport
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Collective-proceedings
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 44

Gutmann v Vodafone Ltd and Vodafone Group PLC

Gutmann v Vodafone Ltd and Vodafone Group PLC [2026] CAT 44 (11 May 2026)

The Tribunal certified collective proceedings brought by Mr Justin Gutmann against Vodafone Limited and Vodafone Group PLC, finding a triable issue on alleged abuse of dominance.

  • Collective proceedings
  • Abuse of dominance
  • Consumer protection
  • Collective-proceedings
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 43

GLOBAL-365 plc & Anor v PayPoint plc & Ors

GLOBAL-365 plc & Anor v PayPoint plc & Ors [2026] CAT 43 (07 May 2026)

The Tribunal allowed an appeal, finding PayPoint plc abused a dominant position by restricting access to essential payment infrastructure and harming competition.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Exclusionary practices
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Exclusionary-practices
  • Access-to-essential-facilities
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 41

Consumers' Association ("Which?") v Apple Inc, Apple Distribution International Limited, Apple Europe Limited & Apple Retail UK Limited

Consumers' Association ("Which?") v Apple Inc, Apple Distribution International Limited, Apple Europe Limited & Apple Retail UK Limited [2026] CAT 41 (06 May 2026)

The Tribunal found Apple abused dominance in app distribution and payment processing, harming UK consumers and competition, and ordered compliance measures and compensation.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Consumer protection
  • Market practices
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Consumer-protection
  • Market-practices
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 35

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited [2026] CAT 35 (21 April 2026)

The Tribunal certified collective proceedings brought by Mr Justin Gutmann against Apple over alleged anti-competitive iPhone performance throttling and consumer losses.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Collective proceedings
  • Damages
  • Collective-proceedings
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Consumer-protection
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 29

Consumers' Association ("Which?") v Apple Inc, Apple Distribution International Limited, Apple Europe Limited & Apple Retail UK Limited

Consumers' Association ("Which?") v Apple Inc, Apple Distribution International Limited, Apple Europe Limited & Apple Retail UK Limited [2026] CAT 29 (02 April 2026)

The Tribunal partly allowed a collective competition claim against Apple, finding dominance in iOS app distribution and abusive practices that harmed consumers.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Consumer protection
  • Collective redress
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Collective-redress
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 28

Kelkoo.com (UK) Limited & Others v Google UK Limited & Others

Kelkoo.com (UK) Limited & Others v Google UK Limited & Others [2026] CAT 28 (26 March 2026)

The Tribunal found Google abused dominance by favouring its own comparison shopping service in search results and ordered remedies to restore competition.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Search engine market
  • Online comparison shopping
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Search-engine-market
  • Online-comparison-shopping
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 25

Mr David Alexander de Horne Rowntree v (1) the Performing Right Society Limited and (2) PRS For Music Limited

Mr David Alexander de Horne Rowntree v (1) the Performing Right Society Limited and (2) PRS For Music Limited [2026] CAT 25 (16 March 2026)

The Competition Appeals Tribunal allowed Mr Rowntree’s appeal, finding the respondents’ music licensing terms abusive and discriminatory under competition law.

  • Collective rights management
  • Abuse of dominance
  • Music licensing
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Music-licensing
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 20

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited [2026] CAT 20 (11 March 2026)

The Tribunal upheld a competition claim against Apple over alleged undisclosed iPhone performance throttling, finding consumers suffered actionable harm.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Consumer protection
  • Class action
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Consumer-protection
Read case analysis
Competition law [2026] CAT 19

Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen v Meta Platforms, Inc. and Others

Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen v Meta Platforms, Inc. and Others [2026] CAT 19 (06 March 2026)

The Competition Appeal Tribunal dismissed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s application against Meta, finding no sufficiently arguable abuse of dominance and refusing collective proceedings certification.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Collective proceedings
  • Digital platforms
  • Competition-law
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Collective-proceedings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.