9 Aug 2024
The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the forfeiture order because credible evidence established that the appellant's failure to report was caused by mainland COVID-19 travel restrictions and the police accepted this; the magistrate who made the forfeiture order was unaware of these facts and would not have made the order if informed, therefore the forfeiture was unjustified.
20 Jun 2023
The appeal is dismissed because the short delay in filing was not fatal but the applicant failed to discharge the evidential burden to rebut the Form 9 assessment: no medical expert evidence was adduced to show the permanent loss of earning capacity exceeded the Form 9 7.5% assessment, and social welfare memoranda and disability assessment forms do not qualify as competent medical expert evidence for this purpose; therefore the trial judge rightly accepted the Form 9 assessment and the resulting compensation calculation.
14 Dec 2022
原告的申索陳述書未能顯示任何使被告個人負有交付租金或其他個人法律責任的關鍵事實；相關指稱實質上涉及被告之僱主ISS或機構行為而非被告個人，且有部分指稱無實際基礎屬瑣屑無聊，故在明顯情況下剔除申索並撤銷訴訟為適當；上訴雖逾期但基於短期逾期、未構成重大不公及無律師代表等理由准予延長。