Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Implementation of judgment

Legal area

Court

27 Jan 2025

CWGH v. CTTC

Citation

[2025] HKFC 23
Court

Family Court
Case number

FCMC13721/2018

The judge found the July and February Summonses were necessary and inevitable given materially changed market circumstances and respondent's defaults and unilateral deductions; respondent's deduction from taxed costs lacked legal basis; stake‑holding was justified to secure enforcement of reserved costs given realistic risk of dissipation; accordingly respondent was ordered to pay costs of the July, February and Stake‑holding Summonses, consent summons to have no order as to costs, and summary assessments were made and directed to be paid from the stake‑held funds.
8 Mar 2019

LLY v. LKY

Citation

[2019] HKFC 66
Court

Family Court
Case number

FCMC6897/2003

The option to purchase granted in the ancillary relief judgment lapsed upon expiry of the stipulated two‑month exercise period and could not be revived; W failed to give an adequate explanation for the substantial delay in applying for extension and the delay caused prejudice to H, so the court exercised its discretion under Order 3 Rule 5 to refuse extension and dismissed both parties' summonses (H's for non‑attendance, W's on merits of extension).
4 Jul 2013

LSY v . HTF

Citation

LSY v . HTF
Court

Family Court
Case number

FCMC2978/2005

Application dismissed: Respondent failed to prove sufficient irregularity to justify a stay or injunction; reduction of upset price and Respondent's failure to register to bid did not establish breach warranting suspension of completion; damages or claims against vendor/auctioneer are the appropriate remedies; costs awarded to Petitioner.

Hong Kong Case Law

CWGH v. CTTC

LLY v. LKY

LSY v . HTF