21 Sept 1993
TEO BEE HIONG AND ANOTHER v. SOUTH CHINA FINANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- TEO BEE HIONG AND ANOTHER v. SOUTH CHINA FINANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV138/1993
Appellants failed to follow the Rules of the Supreme Court (Order 26) in claiming privilege or objecting to interrogatories and did not raise objections at the appropriate stage; their responses (including counter-questions) were inadequate; no error by the trial judges was shown; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the appellants must answer specified interrogatories by the stated deadline or face dismissal of their defence and counterclaim with costs.