31 Aug 2018
HKSAR v. TSANG YAM KUEN, DONALD
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 564
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC55/2017
The court refused certification because the questions raised were fact specific and did not present new points of law of great and general importance; there was no omission in the judge's directions (wilful equated to deliberate was sufficient in context), the summing up fairly presented issues including duty to disclose and seriousness, and the alleged failure by defence counsel was immaterial because no corrective direction was required in the circumstances.