12 Feb 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 朱磊
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1144
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA194/2024
On the whole evidence the trial judge was entitled to find the watch was given in connection with the appellant's public role and to keep him favourably disposed to EEM; the appellant knew reporting obligations and failed to declare the gift; the attendance list was a material item for reimbursement approvals and the prosecution proved dishonesty rather than mere negligence; therefore convictions on all counts were safe beyond reasonable doubt and the appeal fails.