21 Jan 2002
KIAWCHANSAENG, RENU v. HO KIM KAY CANNY
- Citation
- KIAWCHANSAENG, RENU v. HO KIM KAY CANNY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA78/2001
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's intended grounds were too vague and lacked required particulars to show an error of law; the Presiding Officer's findings that the employer's purported deduction was unlawful, that the employer retrieved the cash and thus did not pay the full salary, and that there was deemed dismissal were supported by evidence and did not amount to an arguable error of law under the Labour Tribunal Ordinance.