Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Salary payment

Legal area

Court

3 Sept 2004

TSO MAN WAH v. GOLDEN SAND (HOLDINGS) LTD

Citation

TSO MAN WAH v. GOLDEN SAND (HOLDINGS) LTD
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCLA141/2003

The appeal is allowed in respect of the 2nd Defendant because the Presiding Officer's finding that the 2nd Defendant was a co-employer was tainted by legal errors (misunderstanding of Mr Tso's role and failure to consider the payroll document), and on the correct view the claim against the 2nd Defendant must be dismissed while the award against the 1st Defendant remains.
21 Jan 2002

KIAWCHANSAENG, RENU v. HO KIM KAY CANNY

Citation

KIAWCHANSAENG, RENU v. HO KIM KAY CANNY
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCLA78/2001

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's intended grounds were too vague and lacked required particulars to show an error of law; the Presiding Officer's findings that the employer's purported deduction was unlawful, that the employer retrieved the cash and thus did not pay the full salary, and that there was deemed dismissal were supported by evidence and did not amount to an arguable error of law under the Labour Tribunal Ordinance.