11 May 2026
張惠蘭 對 中國海外物業服務有限公司
- Citation
- [2026] HKCA 913
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP97/2025
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant had no real prospect of success: the costs order on restoration was not unreasonable or legally wrong; the applicant was warned of the mandatory attendance at the case management conference, her adjournment request was not granted, and therefore the costs consequence was properly imposed; accordingly there is no basis to overturn the decision or grant leave.