18 Jul 2012
CHINA RESOURCES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD v. MAX MERIT LTD
- Citation
- CHINA RESOURCES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD v. MAX MERIT LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2012/2010
Defendant breached clause 18 by failing to replace 14 damaged aluminium ceiling panels and is liable to indemnify plaintiff for replacement costs (HK$140,000). The ceiling fans and spotlights were chattels not fixtures and clause 5 was not breached. Late-disclosed photographs and project documents were inadmissible. Plaintiff was not entitled to forfeit the deposit; defendant entitled to balance return of HK$70,203.36. Costs and interest ordered accordingly.