11 May 2015
INTEX RECREATION LTD v. TONY LIU
- Citation
- INTEX RECREATION LTD v. TONY LIU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1788/2013
The court held that the plaintiff established a good arguable case under O.11 r.1(1)(d)(iii) (Loan Agreement arguably an addition to a Hong Kong employment contract and thus governed by Hong Kong law) and r.1(1)(e) (breach arguably committed in Hong Kong by failure to continue deductions), that there was a serious issue to be tried, that Hong Kong is the appropriate forum, and that there was no material non-disclosure to the ex parte master; accordingly the defendant's summons to discharge leave and for a stay was dismissed.