20 Dec 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 陳興濤
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3641
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA434/2023
On re‑trial standard review the High Court found the combined evidence — PW1's credible testimony, the P3 video and screenshots, photos of the damaged phone and the appellant's cautioned statement P5 — proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant caused the phone to fall and damaged it and that he acted either with intent to disable the phone or recklessly as to whether it would be damaged; no lawful excuse (self‑defence) was established, so the conviction and sentence were affirmed.