2 Feb 2011
CHINA CHANCE CORPORATION LTD v. ROCKEFELLER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC
- Citation
- CHINA CHANCE CORPORATION LTD v. ROCKEFELLER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2165/2009
Indemnity costs were refused because, although the affidavit admitted some deliberation in not disclosing the FCPA issue, there was credible evidence that the deponent genuinely believed the FCPA issue was not a genuine or material issue; thus the omission was not the withholding of facts believed to be material and did not justify the exercise of discretion to award indemnity costs. However, a certificate for two counsel was granted because the application involved unusually complex legal issues and voluminous evidence including New York/US FCPA law.