17 Jun 2016
DR CHAN HIN KEUNG HENRY v. APPLE DAILY LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- DR CHAN HIN KEUNG HENRY v. APPLE DAILY LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1474/2013
The pleaded paragraph 15A(4)(l) and paragraphs 39-42 of the witness statement are relevant because the meanings pleaded fall within Chase level 1, most of the SEC Complaint concerns pre-publication events and the post-publication material illustrates the operation of the alleged pyramid scheme as a whole; defendants' knowledge at publication is irrelevant to justification, therefore leave to amend to include paragraph 15A(4)(l) is granted and the strike-out application is dismissed.