29 Aug 2011
RE HO MEI LING
- Citation
- RE HO MEI LING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL51/2011
Leave refused because the Applicant's central legal premise—that the original Lot's residual development potential remained a collective proprietary interest enforceable against BA's statutory approval—was legally unsustainable: BA's role is to apply statutory plot ratio/site coverage rules to the site depicted in submitted plans subject only to deducting previously used potential (Cinat factor); the Applicant failed to show arguable error of law or fact on inclusion of Section B/pedestrian area as 'street'; extension of time refused for unjustified delay and lack of merit.