12 Oct 2023
H, RS v. X, Y
- Citation
- [2023] HKFC 208
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC6733/2023
The court held the requested documents were relevant to the applicant's ancillary relief claims and ordered disclosure (2(1)(e)-(f) and 2(2)(c)-(f)), found the undertakings were sufficient protection equivalent to an injunction but that the applicant was effectively the winner, and exercised discretion under Order 62 r.5 to order the respondent to pay 80% of costs of and incidental to the application inclusive of the ex parte summons with certificate for two counsel, taxed and paid forthwith; penal notice endorsed.