Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Source-linked decisions currently available to browse
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cya burundu cyagabanyijwe kigera kuri 15 ans kidashobora kongera kugabanywa. Ubujurire bwa Karemera nta shingiro bwabonetse.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeye ko Ishimwe Mignone kureka ubujurire bwe, rusiga imikirize n’igihano byari byatanzwe n’inkiko zabanje.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwahamije ko igihano cyo gufungwa imyaka 15 n’ihazabu ya 5.000.000 Frw ari ntarengwa ku byaha byahamijwe, rwanga kugabanya igihano kurushaho.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 cyari gito gishoboka ku cyaha cyo gusambanya umwana uri munsi y’imyaka 14, bityo ubujurire nta shingiro bufite.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 cyari gito gishoboka ku cyaha cyo gusambanya umwana uri munsi y’imyaka 14, bityo ubujurire ntibufite shingiro.
The Supreme Court found that Muhire Jean Claude knowingly prepared and signed false valuation reports, Rukundo Rwigemera Prosper facilitated and participated in the forgery and solicited/received a bribe, and Uwizeyimana Marcelline gave a bribe to obtain a loan. The evidence, including witness testimony and documentary proof, established all elements of the offenses. The court applied the more lenient sentencing provisions and ordered all three to jointly compensate GT Bank for losses.
Source excerpt
RNC is a terrorist group as established by prior judgments and its acts; thus, prosecution for membership of a terrorist group did not require Prosecutor General's authorization. The acts of the accused constitute completed membership of a terrorist group, not attempt, as they consented and took steps to join. Attempt does not apply to this offence. The conviction of Haragirimana was based on credible evidence, including corroborated statements. The offences of joining an irregular armed group and membership of a terrorist group cannot be cumulated; only the latter is retained. Sentences were…
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court held that signed delivery or work sheets can prove a contract even without a formal written agreement, and dismissed PMS Ltd’s review claim.
The conviction was upheld based on the defendant's confession, corroborating witness testimony, and documentary evidence. The sentence reduction previously granted was deemed sufficient given the circumstances and gravity of the offence. The appeal lacked merit and the prior judgment was affirmed.
Source excerpt
Urukiko rw'Ubujurire rwemeje ko CLAY'S FACTORY Ltd igomba gusubiza 132,750 USD, ruvanaho inyungu za 43,879.95 USD, kandi rwerekana ko ubujurire bwuririye ku bundi ku nyungu butakirwa.
Explore more
