Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law RPAA 00375/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NDAGIJIMANA

The Court of Appeal held that Ndagijimana Elie’s appeal grounds were filed too late, so the prosecution’s objection succeeded and the 15-year sentence remained in force.

  • Appeal deadlines
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Procedural compliance
  • Submission of grounds of appeal
  • Appeal-deadlines
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RS/LNJUST/RC 00013/2021/SC

MUNYAMPETA N’UNDI v Me KAYIJUKA N’UNDI

The Supreme Court of Rwanda held that the advocates’ challenge was inadmissible because it sought to undo a definitive part of a mixed judgment already rendered.

  • Advocate withdrawal
  • Finality of judgments
  • Mixed judgments
  • Inheritance
  • Family law
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RLR V.1-2026

UWINEZA ET.AL v POSADA PLUS LTD

The Court of Appeal held that mortgage-auction notices are governed by special mortgage instructions, not general civil procedure, and upheld the auction.

  • Mortgage auction
  • Notification requirements
  • Costs and advocate fees
  • Priority of special over general law
  • Mortgage-auction
  • Auction-notice
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00251/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NIYIHABA

The Court of Appeal held that the appellant's admission of guilt and other mitigating factors had already been considered by the High Court, which reduced his sentence from life imprisonment to 25 years. No legal error or abuse of discretion was demonstrated in the High Court's decision. The gravity and brutality of the offence justified the sentence imposed. The appeal was therefore dismissed as unfounded.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeals
  • Homicide
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00327/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NDAYAMBAJE

The Court of Appeal found that, although Ndayambaje committed a serious offense by defiling a 15-year-old and detaining her for four days, he was 22 years old and a first-time offender. These factors constituted mitigating circumstances. Applying Article 2(b) of Law N° 059/2023, the sentence was reduced to 13 years' imprisonment, consistent with similar precedents.

  • Defilement of a minor
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RLR V.4-2025

MUTABAZI v. LETA Y’U RWANDA/MINADEF N’ABANDI

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction because the damages awarded to Mutabazi Steven and appealed by him do not reach the statutory threshold of RWF 75,000,000. Only the amount awarded to the appellant and actually appealed is relevant for jurisdiction, not the aggregate of all awards to all parties.

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Quantum of damages
  • Joinder of parties
  • Costs and attorney fees
Read case analysis
Criminal law

IMIRONGO CoA - No 21 - November -2024

Court of Appeal digest setting out binding principles on appeals, sentencing, evidence, criminal procedure, and recognition of foreign judgments.

  • Appeals
  • Sentencing
  • Evidence
  • Procedural deadlines
  • Damages
  • Auction annulment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCOMAA 00024/2023/CA

WHITEFIELD INVESTMENT COMPANY Ltd vs THOMAS ET PIRON GRANDS LACS, N’ABANDI.

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear a second appeal in commercial matters where the total damages awarded in the lower courts do not reach 75,000,000 Frw, regardless of the original value of the property in dispute, and the appeal is therefore inadmissible.

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Quantum of damages
  • Costs and attorney fees
  • Procedural bars
Read case analysis
Labour law RSOCA 00109/20224/HC/KIG

NKURUNZIZA v TECOS Ltd

The court held that failure to submit the discrimination claim to the labour inspector did not preclude judicial review since amicable procedures were followed. The applicant was not entitled to salary equalization with engineers due to differences in qualifications. Compensation for unfair dismissal was recalculated to nine months' salary due to over ten years' service, resulting in an additional award. Claims for vexatious litigation damages were rejected for lack of substantiation. Partial legal costs and attorney fees were awarded.

  • Unlawful termination
  • Employment discrimination
  • Compensation for unfair dismissal
  • Salary arrears
  • Procedural requirements in labour disputes
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.