Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RS/INJUST/RP 00005/2021/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KINYOGOTE

The Court of Appeal upheld Hitimana Hubert’s conviction and prison sentence, but removed compensation for land purchase losses and left only litigation costs.

  • Impersonation
  • Forgery
  • Fraud
  • Land sale
  • Compensation
  • Application of new law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00874/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs KAYUMBA

The Court of Appeal upheld an 18-year sentence and RWF 10,000,000 fine for cannabis trafficking, holding no further reduction was warranted under the new law.

  • Sentencing
  • Recidivism
  • Application of new law
  • Reduction of sentence
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Sentence-reduction
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00443/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HAKIZIYAREMYE

The Court of Appeal rejected a provocation claim, held that Hakiziyaremye intentionally injured Kimasa Robert, and reduced the sentence under a later, lighter law.

  • Assault
  • Intentional bodily harm
  • Mitigation of sentence
  • Change of offence description
  • Application of new law
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00195/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs SIBORUREMA

The Court of Appeal held that Siborurema’s 15-year sentence could not be reduced further, because current law sets that as the statutory minimum despite mitigating factors.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Drug offences
  • Application of new law
  • Minimum sentences
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00139/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs IRADUKUNDA

The appeal was dismissed because the sentence imposed (16 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 RWF) was found to be appropriate, proportionate to the gravity and circumstances of the offense, and within the range prescribed by the new, more lenient law. The court is not compelled to further reduce the sentence solely because a new law prescribes a lower minimum penalty.

  • Robbery with violence
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Application of new law
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00516/2022/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v DUSABAMAHORO N’UNDI

The appellants had already received the minimum sentence permitted by the new law (15 years) due to their guilty plea and cooperation. The law prohibits further reduction or suspension below this threshold, and previous case law allowing lower sentences is no longer applicable. The appeal lacked merit and the High Court's sentence stands.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Application of new law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00153/2021/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UKWITEGETSE

The court held that the appellant had already benefited from a reduced sentence due to his admission of guilt, and that the statutory minimum under the new law (20 years) was properly applied. The court found no compelling mitigating circumstances to justify a further reduction, especially given the serious harm caused to the minor and the appellant's conduct after the offense. The appeal was dismissed as unfounded.

  • Defilement
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Application of new law
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.