Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellant's admission of guilt was already considered by the High Court in reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 25 years. No credible evidence of provocation was presented, and the issue was not raised at trial, making it inadmissible on appeal. The High Court did not err in its sentencing discretion, and no further mitigation was warranted.
Source excerpt
Micomyiza Christophe's admission of guilt was considered and resulted in mitigation from life imprisonment to 25 years. No credible evidence of provocation was presented at trial, and new grounds raised on appeal regarding provocation cannot be considered. The sentence imposed by the High Court was appropriate given the brutality of the crime and the circumstances.
Source excerpt
The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that Niwemugeni Hilarie did not prove provocation in her husband’s killing and upheld the 25-year prison sentence.
The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for intentional homicide, refused to reclassify the offence, and held that provocation raised on appeal was not admissible.
The court found that Ndabazi Evariste intentionally killed his wife by striking her on the head with a hoe, a deadly weapon, resulting in her death the next day. There was no credible evidence of provocation, and the gravity and brutality of the offence justified upholding the life sentence. The appeal lacked merit and the conviction and sentence were affirmed.
Source excerpt
The court found that Uwamahoro Claire intentionally killed the victim by stabbing her in the torso with a knife, which demonstrates intent to kill under established jurisprudence. The claim of provocation was not properly raised at trial and cannot be considered on appeal. The sentence of 18 years' imprisonment was deemed appropriate and sufficiently mitigated given the circumstances and remorse shown; no further reduction was warranted.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal rejected a provocation claim, held that Hakiziyaremye intentionally injured Kimasa Robert, and reduced the sentence under a later, lighter law.
Nzabakira Eric failed to provide credible evidence of provocation, and the act was committed with cruelty. However, considering he had no prior convictions, the sentence was reduced from 25 to 15 years' imprisonment under judicial discretion and the amended law.
Source excerpt
The court found Nzirorera Damien guilty of intentional murder, rejecting claims of provocation due to the elapsed time between the altercation and the fatal stabbing. The minimum sentence of 15 years was imposed, as mitigating factors were recognized but no further reduction is permitted by law.
Source excerpt
Explore more
