Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land law final RUSTIS ALOYCE TARIMO tanzlii

final RUSTIS ALOYCE TARIMO tanzlii

The High Court declared the plaintiff owner of Plot No. 546 Block JJJ, ordered valuation and compensation for the 1st defendant’s mud house, and dismissed unproved damages claims.

  • Land ownership
  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Trespass
  • Customary tenure
  • Demarcation of boundaries
  • Special and general damages
Read case analysis
Human rights law paul et baedan mbouke faustinc v republique de cote divoire requete n 0192020 2023 afchpr 27 5 septembre 2023

paul et baedan mbouke faustinc v republique de cote divoire requete n 0192020 2023 afchpr 27 5 septembre 2023

The State violated the applicants’ right to be judged within a reasonable time and to the execution of a judicial decision by failing to ensure timely enforcement of the compensation judgment. Other alleged violations (right to information, dignity, equality, non-discrimination) were not established as the applicants had access to information, were ultimately compensated under the law, and did not demonstrate differential or degrading treatment.

  • Expropriation
  • Right to a fair trial
  • Right to information
  • Right to dignity
  • Equality before the law
  • Non-discrimination
Read case analysis
International law rugo farm company v attorney general of the republic of burundi 2022 eacj 3 7 april 2022

rugo farm company v attorney general of the republic of burundi 2022 eacj 3 7 april 2022

The EACJ held it had jurisdiction, found the land sale to Rugo Farm lawful, and ruled that Burundi’s Special Court breached the Treaty by ignoring constitutional procedure.

  • Jurisdiction of eacj
  • Right to property
  • Rule of law
  • Treaty interpretation
  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Eacj-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Human rights miles investments 2 autres c republique de sierra leone communication 623 of 2016 2021 achpr 4 17 avril 2021

miles investments 2 autres c republique de sierra leone communication 623 of 2016 2021 achpr 4 17 avril 2021

The applicants failed to submit evidence and arguments on admissibility within the prescribed and extended deadlines, demonstrating lack of interest and diligence, warranting the striking out of the communication.

  • Right to property
  • Fair trial
  • Access to justice
  • State obligations
  • Compensation for expropriation
Read case analysis
Human rights law miles investments 2 outros vs republica da sierra leone 2021 achpr 4 17 abril 2021

miles investments 2 outros vs republica da sierra leone 2021 achpr 4 17 abril 2021

The applicants failed to submit the required evidence and arguments on admissibility within the prescribed and extended deadlines, demonstrating lack of diligence and precluding the Commission from determining admissibility.

  • Admissibility of complaints
  • Right to property
  • Due process
  • State obligations
  • Compensation for expropriation
Read case analysis
Human rights law centre for minority rights development and another v kenya communication 276 of 2003 2009 achpr 102 25 november 2009

centre for minority rights development and another v kenya communication 276 of 2003 2009 achpr 102 25 november 2009

The African Commission held that the Endorois are a distinct indigenous people and that Kenya’s eviction, denial of access, and lack of compensation violated the Charter.

  • Right to property
  • Right to culture
  • Right to religion
  • Right to development
  • Right to natural resources
  • Indigenous land rights
Read case analysis
Constitutional law attorney general vs akoonay another 1994 tzhc 4 21 december 1994

attorney general vs akoonay another 1994 tzhc 4 21 december 1994

Customary or deemed rights of occupancy are property protected by Article 24 of the Constitution; deprivation of such rights without fair compensation is unconstitutional; statutory ouster of court jurisdiction is unconstitutional; only the unconstitutional provisions of the Regulation of Land Tenure (Established Villages) Act, 1992 should be struck down, not the entire Act; in areas where customary rights were extinguished before the Bill of Rights became enforceable, the constitutional protections do not apply retrospectively.

  • Customary land rights
  • Property rights
  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Ouster of court jurisdiction
  • Separation of powers
  • Retrospective application of law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.