Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Human rights law ange c republic of cote divoire requete n 0342019 2025 afchpr 1 5 fevrier 2025

ange c republic of cote divoire requete n 0342019 2025 afchpr 1 5 fevrier 2025

The applicant did not exhaust available and effective domestic remedies, specifically the cassation appeal, and neither lack of counsel nor ignorance of the remedy excuses this failure. The application is therefore inadmissible.

  • Right to fair trial
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Judicial assistance
  • Proportionality of sentence
Read case analysis
Human rights law moussa c republique de cote divoire requete n0292019 2024 afchpr 29 13 novembre 2024

moussa c republique de cote divoire requete n0292019 2024 afchpr 29 13 novembre 2024

The applicant did not exhaust available and effective domestic remedies, specifically the cassation appeal, and neither lack of legal assistance nor ignorance of the remedy excuses this failure. Therefore, the application is inadmissible.

  • Right to fair trial
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Judicial assistance
  • Proportionality of sentence
  • Dignity of detainees
Read case analysis
Human rights law moses c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0332017 2023 afchpr 24 5 septembre 2023

moses c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0332017 2023 afchpr 24 5 septembre 2023

The application was not filed within a reasonable time after the respondent's declaration allowing individual applications; the applicant failed to justify the delay. The application is therefore inadmissible.

  • Right to fair trial
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Reasonable time for application
  • Corporal punishment
  • Judicial assistance
Read case analysis
Human rights abubakari c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0032013 2019 afchpr 86 4 juillet 2019

abubakari c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0032013 2019 afchpr 86 4 juillet 2019

The Court is competent to award reparations for violations of fair trial rights established in its prior judgment. Applicant failed to prove material damages or loss of income, but is entitled to moral damages for himself, his spouse, and his son, based on evidence of relationship and harm. Indirect victims must prove filiation; only spouse and son met this threshold. Non-pecuniary reparations include publication of judgments and reporting obligations. Requests for non-repetition guarantees and release are denied as moot or unnecessary. Each party bears its own costs.

  • Right to fair trial
  • Judicial assistance
  • Reparations
  • Non-repetition guarantees
  • Publication of judgments
Read case analysis
Human rights law avocats sans frontiers v burundi communication 231 of 1999 2000 achpr 21 6 november 2000

avocats sans frontiers v burundi communication 231 of 1999 2000 achpr 21 6 november 2000

The refusal by the Ngozi Court of Appeal to adjourn the hearing in the absence of the accused's counsel, especially in a capital case, and the Supreme Court's endorsement of this approach, violated the right to defence and fair trial under Article 7(1)(c) of the African Charter. The court's reliance on written submissions as a substitute for oral defence and its failure to ensure legal assistance at all stages did not meet international fair trial standards. Burundian law and practice, as applied, failed to comply with the country's treaty obligations.

  • Right to fair trial
  • Right to legal counsel
  • Judicial assistance
  • Equality before the law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.