Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellant, having freely entered into an agreement to retire in lieu of retrenchment, is bound by that agreement and cannot claim both retrenchment and retirement benefits. The retirement agreement replaced the prior retrenchment arrangement, and the law does not permit simultaneous entitlement to both benefit schemes.
Source excerpt
The African Court reopened pleadings and extended time for Tanzania to file its response and reparations submissions in a dispute over unpaid subsistence allowances.
Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for delay, did not account for each day, and exhibited negligence in complying with court-ordered timelines. Extension of time cannot be granted in absence of good cause.
Source excerpt
The appellants are entitled to salary increments as per Scopo Directive No. 57 and Treasury Registrar Circular No. 4 of 1993, as these governed their employment and the respondent failed to prove inapplicability. The Industrial Court erred in denying these increments.
Source excerpt
Appellants are entitled to salary increments as per Scopa Directive No. 57 and Treasury Registrar Circular No. 4 of 1993; respondent failed to prove inapplicability and cannot avoid payment of increments due during employment.
Source excerpt
The appellants' salaries were governed by Scopo Directive No. 57, and the respondent failed to prove its inapplicability; thus, the appellants are entitled to salary increments as per the directive and Treasury Registrar Circular No. 4 of 1993.
Source excerpt
The High Court quashed the Labour Commissioner’s decision, holding that it was ultra vires because he ordered payment of non-statutory retrenchment benefits.
Explore more
