2 Jul 2024
林金群 對 林家孝及另三人
- Citation
- [2024] HKDC 1075
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC2585/2021
R2 (SINGLE MINDED CATERERS LIMITED trading as CATEE) was the sole employer at the time of the accident. R1 (director) was not the employer by virtue of directorship and managerial role, and R3 (XOLO) was not the employer because payroll receipts and contemporaneous evidence showed CATEE (R2) employed and paid the applicant and there was no evidence of shared premises or other indicia of joint employment. Compensation was assessed on the s9/s10/s10A findings in Form 9 and awarded accordingly.