Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Civil procedure RC00002/2025/SC

Re MADAMU BERNADETTE N’UNDI

The Supreme Court clarified its prior inheritance ruling, holding that all 30 UPI parcels listed in the land registry report form part of the Ruhabura succession.

  • Clarification of judgment
  • Succession of property
  • Land registration
  • Execution of judgments
  • Clarification-of-judgment
  • Succession-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00812/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. IHIMBAZWE

The Court of Appeal held that knowingly transporting 200 boules of cannabis to another person amounts to drug trafficking, not mere possession, and upheld the conviction.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Possession of narcotics
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Drug-trafficking
  • Narcotics-possession
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00559/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABAGUHIRWA

The court held that Habaguhirwa Etienne's actions—transporting three kilograms of cannabis for a promised payment—constituted drug trafficking under Rwandan law. His admissions and the evidence confirmed he knowingly moved the drugs between districts, fulfilling the material and mental elements of the offense. The mitigating factors had already been considered by the High Court, and there was no basis to alter the conviction or further reduce the sentence.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Elements of criminal liability
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00226/2025/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BIZIMANA

The Court of Appeal upheld Bizimana Sosthène’s conviction for cannabis trafficking and confirmed the minimum reduced sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment and a 5,000,000 Frw fine.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Change of charge
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00619/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v IYAKAREMYE

The Court of Appeal upheld a 15-year sentence for Iyakaremye Anastase, holding that he had not shown any misuse of law or discretion warranting further reduction.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Mitigating-circumstances
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Constitutional law RLR V.1-2026

Re NSABIMANA

The Supreme Court held that Article 41 of Law No 30/2018 does not violate the Constitution, finding the appeal distinction in genocide cases justified.

  • Equality before the law
  • Appeals in genocide cases
  • Judicial review of statutes
  • Equality-before-the-law
  • Constitutional-review
  • Criminal-appeals
Read case analysis
Insurance law RS/INJUST/RC 00012/2024/SC

SANLAM AG Plc vs TURYASINGURA

The Supreme Court partly granted SANLAM AG Plc’s review, upheld most of the damages analysis, and ordered Turyasingura Victor to refund overpaid expenses.

  • Compensation for motor vehicle accident
  • Medical expenses reimbursement
  • Cross-border medical treatment
  • Burden of proof for damages
  • Review on grounds of injustice
  • Motor-vehicle-accident-compensation
Read case analysis
Civil law

IMIRONGO SC FEBUARY – JULY 2025

There was no valid settlement agreement between the applicants and SONARWA as required by law, and the limitation period was suspended due to ongoing negotiations. Therefore, the claim was not time-barred and applicants were entitled to pursue compensation.

  • Authority and rights of representatives in settlement agreements
  • Limitation period for compensation claims
  • Compensation for road accident damages
Read case analysis
Administrative law RADAA00008/2022/CA

UMUJYI WA KIGALI v. ABAZUNGURA BA RWIGARA

The appeal partially succeeds: compensation is limited to the portion of land not already compensated by RSSB (2,075 m2), calculated at the current market rate (60,000 Frw/m2), plus statutory damages for expropriation delay. Consultancy fees are denied due to insufficient evidence and lack of causal link to the appellant's actions. Each party bears its own litigation costs.

  • Expropriation for public interest
  • Compensation calculation
  • Burden of proof
  • Appeal scope
  • Consultancy fees
  • Procedural objections
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.