Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law RPAA 00861/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWAYEZU

The Court of Appeal held that Uwayezu Emmanuel was not criminally responsible for attempted murder because expert evidence showed schizophrenia affecting his mental capacity.

  • Criminal responsibility
  • Mental illness
  • Insanity defense
  • Attempted murder
  • Criminal-responsibility
  • Mental-illness
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01374/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NSHIMIRIMANA

The Court of Appeal found no proof beyond reasonable doubt that Nshimirimana Emmanuel trafficked cannabis, allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction, and ordered his release.

  • Standard of proof
  • Drug offences
  • Benefit of the doubt
  • Appeals procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Evidence-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01316/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BIBAMBISI

The Court of Appeal dismissed the accused’s appeal, upheld his conviction for drug possession, and held that related witnesses’ testimony may be relied on if assessed by the court.

  • Drug offences
  • Assessment of evidence
  • Witness credibility
  • Procedural errors
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01050/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MUSHINZIMANA

The Court of Appeal dismissed a defendant’s bid for a lower sentence, holding that the 15-year prison term and RWF 5 million fine were the statutory minimums.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Statutory minimum sentences
  • Appeals
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00866/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KAMBARI

The Court of Appeal found that the testimonies of the victim and witness were consistent and corroborated by the medical report, which showed physical signs of sexual assault. The defense’s alternative explanations were unsupported and contradicted by the evidence. The court held that the conviction was based on reliable, corroborated evidence and that the sentence imposed was appropriate given the gravity of the offence.

  • Sexual offences against children
  • Assessment of evidence
  • Standard of proof in criminal cases
  • Appeals procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01352/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NDWANIYE

The Court of Appeal dismissed Ndwaniye Damascène’s challenge to his 15-year sentence for defilement of a minor, holding the conviction was supported by evidence.

  • Sexual offences
  • Appeals
  • Burden of proof
  • Assessment of evidence
  • Criminal-law
  • Sexual-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01225/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NSENGIYAREMYE

Confessions made by Nsengiyaremye during investigation, corroborated by witness testimony and local administrative reports, constitute sufficient evidence for conviction; absence of medical evidence does not negate the offence given detailed confession and supporting evidence.

  • Child sexual abuse
  • Evidence assessment
  • Confession validity
  • Medical expertise in criminal trials
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00931/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v TUYIZERE

The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.

  • Murder
  • Provocation
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Sentencing
  • Witness testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01249/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MUKASHYAKA

The appellate court found that Mukashyaka Divine's conviction for trafficking in narcotics was supported by her repeated confessions and corroborating witness and documentary evidence. The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 RWF was the minimum allowed by law after mitigation and could not be further reduced. Suspension of the sentence was not available as the custodial term exceeded five years and no evidence of dependent children was provided.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Suspension of sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01048/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. TWIZEYUMUREMYI

The Court of Appeal held that a life sentence reduced for mitigating circumstances cannot go below 15 years, so the appeal against sentence was dismissed.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Drug offences
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.