Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Civil procedure RCAA00054/2024/CA

UMURYANGO WA KAMINUZA YA GITWE (UNIVERSITY OF GITWE) vs MUKAMWEZI

The Court of Appeal found the second appeal inadmissible because the appellant had already lost in the lower courts on the same ground: failure to prove the land’s origin.

  • Admissibility of second appeal
  • Burden of proof in property disputes
  • Land registration
  • Compensation for legal costs
  • Admissibility-of-second-appeal
  • Land-ownership-dispute
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01045/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. TWIZEYIMANA

The Court of Appeal held that a life sentence reduced for mitigating circumstances cannot go below 15 years. Twizeyimana’s further appeal was dismissed.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Drug-offences
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00287/2025/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NIYONSENGA

The Court of Appeal upheld Niyonsenga Bosco’s conviction for defilement, holding that his investigative confession was reliable and the medical report did not negate the offence.

  • Rape of a minor
  • Admissibility of confessions
  • Value of medical evidence
  • Child witness testimony
  • Criminal-law
  • Evidence-law
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RSA/INTERT/RC 00001/2024/CA

GASORE N’ABANDI v. UMUHOZA N’ABANDI

The appeal was not based solely on the clarification decision but sought to challenge the principal judgment after the statutory appeal period had expired. The law does not permit using clarification or correction as a means to reopen appeal of the main judgment after the deadline. Therefore, the appeal was inadmissible for being out of time.

  • Appeal timelines
  • Judgment clarification
  • Inheritance distribution
  • Costs and attorney fees
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00899/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABAGUHIRWA

The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal appeal, holding that a sentence already reduced to the statutory minimum cannot be reduced further, and that the mandatory fine remained payable.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
  • Appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01284/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MUNYANEZA

The Court of Appeal upheld a trafficking conviction for Munyaneza Amos, finding that 1 kg of cannabis brought from Tanzania indicated distribution rather than personal use.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Drug possession
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Drug-trafficking
  • Drug-possession
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCAA 00054/2024/CA

UMURYANGO WA KAMINUZA YA GITWE (UNIVERSITY OF GITWE) v. MUKAMWEZI

The Court found that both lower courts dismissed applicant's claims on the same substantive ground—failure to prove origin of the disputed land—making the second appeal inadmissible under Article 52(3) Law No 30/2018. Differences in evidence or statutes cited do not alter the sameness of the grounds.

  • Jurisdiction of appellate courts
  • Second appeal
  • Burden of proof
  • Land ownership
  • Inheritance
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA01308/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NDACYAYISENGA

The sentence imposed on Ndacyayisenga Ismaël is the minimum permitted by law for the offence, given the established mitigating circumstances. Further reduction or suspension is legally barred.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Drug offences
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Administrative law RS/INJUST/RAD00005/2024/CA

SINDIZERA v. RSSB

The Court of Appeal dismissed Sindizera’s review request, holding that he could not raise a new injustice ground and that the pension dispute was governed by the special pension law.

  • Pension calculation
  • Judicial review
  • Procedural law
  • Special vs general statutes
  • Pension-law
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00940/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v HAKIZIMANA

The minimum sentence for drug trafficking with mitigating circumstances is 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw. The lower court correctly imposed the minimum custodial sentence, but the fine should be reduced to the statutory minimum. Suspension of the sentence is not permitted as the custodial term exceeds five years.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.