Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law RPAA 00848/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KANYABIKARI

The Court of Appeal held that, despite the appellant's confession and lack of prior record, the gravity and cruelty of the offense justified maintaining the 25-year sentence. The court is not compelled to reduce a sentence further solely due to mitigating circumstances, especially where the offense was committed with extreme brutality.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Homicide
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00105/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MANIRIHO

Due to conflicting evidence regarding the victim's age and the absence of a definitive birth certificate or equivalent judicial decision, the court found reasonable doubt as to whether the victim was underage at the time of cohabitation. In accordance with the principle that doubt must benefit the accused, Maniriho Jérôme was acquitted.

  • Defilement
  • Proof of age
  • Evidentiary standards
  • Benefit of the doubt
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00769/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs BIZABARIMANA

The sentence imposed on Bizabarimana Cléophas is the minimum permitted by law for the offense; further reduction is not legally possible, and additional appeal grounds submitted late are inadmissible.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Mitigating circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00769/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA Vs UWOMPORANSANGA

The Court of Appeal upheld a life sentence for murder, finding no immediate provocation and holding that mitigating factors did not justify reduction.

  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Murder
  • Appeal procedure
  • Sentencing discretion
  • Criminal-law
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00869/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs UWAMAHORO

The court found that Uwamahoro Claire intentionally killed the victim by stabbing her in a vital area with a deadly weapon, and that provocation was not properly raised at trial and thus could not be considered on appeal. The sentence of 18 years' imprisonment was deemed appropriate and not subject to further reduction.

  • Murder
  • Assault and battery
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Mitigating circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00410/2023/CA /CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs NIWEMUGENI

The Court of Appeal held that Niwemugeni Hilarie did not prove provocation in her husband’s killing and upheld the 25-year prison sentence.

  • Murder
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Provocation
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00896/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs UWIMANA MUHOZA

The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment is the minimum permissible under the amended law for the offence of trafficking in narcotic drugs with mitigating circumstances; further reduction is not legally possible. The fine is reduced to 5,000,000 FRW due to additional mitigating factors. Suspended sentence is not available as the custodial sentence exceeds five years.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00894/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs SIBOMANA

The Court of Appeal held that Sibomana Eric had already received the minimum lawful sentence for cannabis trafficking and could not have it further reduced or suspended.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.