UFITINGABIRE v. MUGABO N’UNDI
__CONTENT_FILTERED__
Source excerpt
- Content Filtered
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Source-linked decisions currently available to browse
__CONTENT_FILTERED__
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because the conviction for selling narcotic drugs was supported by the defendant's own admissions and corroborating evidence, and the sentence imposed was already the minimum allowed by law given the mitigating circumstances.
Source excerpt
The appeal was not admissible because it was filed outside the three working day period required for appeals in urgent proceedings concerning confirmation of commercial debts and conversion of provisional seizure to execution, as stipulated by the relevant procedural law.
Source excerpt
The court found that Habiyakare Jean-Paul intentionally killed the victim using a deadly object (stone) to the head, constituting murder under the law. However, considering he was a first-time offender and only 19 years old at the time, the sentence was reduced from life imprisonment to 25 years.
Source excerpt
The court found that the conviction was supported by consistent evidence: the appellant's confession during police investigation, corroborating witness testimony, and medical findings. The claim of duress was unsubstantiated. However, considering the appellant's youth, lack of prior convictions, and the nature of the offence, the sentence of life imprisonment was reduced to fifteen years' imprisonment.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that the minimum 15-year prison term could not be reduced further, but the fine could be lowered for mitigating circumstances.
The Court of Appeal upheld a jurisdictional objection and struck out RRA’s second appeal, finding it had lost in both lower courts on the same grounds.
The Court of Appeal granted a rectification application and corrected a clerical date error in a prior judgment, changing 17/01/2015 to 17/01/2025.
A Court of Appeal collection summarizing Supreme Court precedents across civil, commercial, labour, and administrative matters, with extracted legal rules and cited authorities.
The conviction was upheld because the evidence—including corroborated witness statements and the accused's signed admission—proved beyond reasonable doubt that Mbihonge Jean transported cannabis. Minor discrepancies in witness testimony did not affect the reliability of the evidence. However, as a first-time offender, the sentence was reduced from life imprisonment to 25 years' imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 Rwandan Francs, reflecting both the seriousness of the offence and mitigating circumstances.
Source excerpt
Explore more