Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held it lacked jurisdiction over a second appeal because the applicant had lost in both lower courts on the same grounds.
The Court of Appeal held that Barawumfitiye Vestine’s appeal was a second appeal and inadmissible because it fell outside the court’s jurisdiction under article 52.
The Court of Appeal held the second appeal inadmissible because the applicants had been defeated in both lower courts on the same grounds: failure to prove ownership.
The Court of Appeal held that Akarere ka Nyabihu’s second appeal was inadmissible because the lower courts rejected it on the same essential grounds.
The Court of Appeal held that Muganza Kivu Tea Factory’s second appeal was inadmissible because it had lost on the same essential grounds in the lower courts.
The Supreme Court held that the appeal was within its jurisdiction because the earlier judgment lacked adequate reasons and failed to address all appeal grounds.
Explore more
