Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application was declared inadmissible because it was not filed within a reasonable time after exhaustion of domestic remedies, and the applicant failed to provide justification for the delay.
Source excerpt
The Court found it had jurisdiction but declared the application inadmissible because the applicant filed two years and three months after exhaustion of local remedies, which was deemed unreasonable under Article 56(6) of the Charter and Rule 40(6) of the Rules.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to exhaust available judicial remedies in Rwanda, and his reasons for not doing so do not fall within the exceptions provided for admissibility. Therefore, the application is inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The application is inadmissible because the same parties and issues were previously resolved by the UN Human Rights Committee, fulfilling the non bis in idem principle under Article 56(7) of the African Charter. Admissibility requirements are cumulative; failure to meet one renders the application inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to exhaust available domestic judicial remedies, and none of the exceptions to this requirement were substantiated; therefore, the application is inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The application is inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust available domestic remedies as required by Article 40(5) of the Rules; thus, the Tribunal cannot consider whether the application was filed within a reasonable time or other admissibility conditions.
Source excerpt
The request was timely but failed to specify dispositive points requiring interpretation and did not seek clarification of the meaning or scope of any dispositive provision; therefore, it did not meet admissibility requirements.
Source excerpt
The African Court held that the application was inadmissible for failure to exhaust local remedies on both compensation and police brutality claims.
Explore more
